• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

An estimate that arrives instantly should be treated as a warning, not a service level. A competent dedicated development team returns a list of questions: about users and volumes. A supplier that commits to a figure with no clarification is pricing a guess, and a guess will be corrected later — at your expense.

Be wary of a mismatch between the people you meet and the developers actually assigned. Ask for the names and CVs of the actual team in the contract, with wording covering replacement. A provider that only offers abstract roles and never names individuals is keeping the right to assign anyone it likes.

Ask for the source repository from day one. A team that shows nothing between demos is asking you to take delivery on faith. Daily commits tell you how many people are really working far better than any status report. This extends to the build and deployment setup: if nothing runs automatically, promises about quality remain unverifiable.

Ambiguous wording in the contract around IP is not a formality. The document needs to state plainly that all deliverables belong to your react native development company on payment. Look too at the jurisdiction and the milestone terms: java development services heavy prepayment with no deliverable attached takes away your only leverage.

Finally, look at how they communicate. Establish how many hours there will be each day, who answers questions and within what time. Four hours of overlap is normally sufficient; zero overlap stretches every clarification into a lost day. Unclear written communication in the early emails will not improve later.