• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A quote that comes back within a day counts as a warning, not a service level. Any serious team returns clarifying questions before any number: about integrations. A vendor that quotes with no clarification is pricing a guess, and that guess becomes a change request later — at your expense.

Watch for a gap between the engineers on the sales call and retail ecommerce platform development company the people who will code. Ask for named engineers in the agreement, with a provision that requires notice before anyone is swapped. A vendor laravel vs. symfony that talks only about a pool of resources and will not commit to people is reserving its own flexibility at your cost.

Ask for the source repository from the start. A partner that shows a build only at the end of each phase expects you to accept a black box. Visible commits reveal who is really on the project far better than a weekly report. The same applies to the build and deployment setup: if there is no pipeline, promises about quality are unverifiable.

Loose wording in the contract around code ownership is never an accident. The document must state explicitly that the code, designs and documentation become the property of the client as they are paid for. Also check the governing law and the milestone terms: a request for most of the money up front with nothing due in return for weeks takes away any leverage you would otherwise keep.

Last, look at communication. Ask how much working-time overlap there will be with your timezone, who handles your questions and how quickly. Some genuine overlap is usually enough; none at all converts each small question into a day of delay. Careless writing in the early emails rarely improves once the work starts.